A report of five year ban on human cloning research

In his book The Ethics of Genetic Control: Paul McHugh, a member of the President's Council who objects to the destruction of human embryos and who had voted with the Council majority for a moratorium on cloning-for-biomedical research, argued in a medical journal article that SCNT "resembles a tissue culture," and that the products of SCNT should be available for research once regulations are in place to ensure that SCNT is conducted ethically.

As he wrote in a article in Nature: Nevertheless, our ethical and policy analysis leads us to the conclusion that some deliberate public policy at the federal level is needed in the area of human cloning.

The Secretary would be required to prepare and submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an annual report describing the activities and research conducted.

New laws to comprehensively ban all forms of human cloning are to be introduced and there is to be a moratorium on the use of genetic tests by insurance companies.

I think it's a great shame that that is happening. It would promote a fuller and better-informed public debate. William Hurlbut, another Council member who objects to the destruction of human embryos and voted for the moratorium, made a proposal to explore the possibility of using SCNT in combination with techniques to ensure that the group of cells created cannot give rise to human life but can generate embryonic stem cells.

Production of a cloned human embryo, formed for the proximate purpose of using it in research or for extracting its stem cells, with the ultimate goals of gaining scientific knowledge of normal and abnormal development and of developing cures for human diseases.

Public reaction to the prospect of cloning-for-biomedical-research has been mixed: Fathers could become "twin brothers" to their "sons"; mothers could give birth to their genetic twins; and grandparents would also be the "genetic parents" of their grandchildren.

The Vatican, which has an observer status at the United Nations, was the first to propose that the convention be expanded to include a ban on research cloning as well. Seven Members of the Council recommend a ban on cloning-to-produce-children, with regulation of the use of cloned embryos for biomedical research.

A predecessor to the President's Council, the National Bioethics Advisory Commission NBACrecommended, in Cloning Human Beings, 50 the continuation of a moratorium on federal funding for reproductive purposes with a call for voluntary compliance from the private sector.

Back to Text Huxley, Aldous. The Council, reflecting the differences of opinion in American society, is divided regarding the ethics of research involving cloned embryos.

Gunther Stent, a molecular biologist at the University of California at Berkeley, echoed this view that human cloning would contribute to human perfection. At one time, Dr.

Special report: Dim chance for global cloning ban

These concerns need not frighten us into abandoning an important avenue of research. Also joining the fray were scientists who formed a global coalition last fall to lobby against the U. Singapore, South Korea, Japan and China, all have legislation prohibiting reproductive cloning and regulating research cloning.

The Department of Health is also beginning talks with US pharmaceutical firm Myriad over access to its gene research into breast cancer. The safety concerns of reproductive cloning do not apply in therapeutic cloning, placing much of the scientific community, such as the National Academies, in favor of it.

Other types of embryo research ensuing from the development and use of IVF, such as cloning and stem cells, were therefore also blocked. Back to Text Regalado, A. As summarized by the Council minority, "We believe that this research could provide relief to millions of Americans, and that the government should therefore support is, within sensible limits imposed by regulation.

A national discourse on this subject has not yet taken place in full, and a moratorium, by making it impossible for either side to cling to the status-quo, would force both to make their full case before the public.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Inwhen California adopted a five year ban on human reproductive cloning, the legislation required the appointment of an expert.

Data Protection Choices

Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry Table of Contents NBAC released its report Cloning Human Beings, "A Ban on Cloning and Cloning Research Is Unjustified," testimony before the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, March 14, Macklin, R. Majority Recommendation: Ten Members of the Council recommend a ban on cloning-to-produce-children combined with a four-year moratorium on cloning-for-biomedical-research.

We also call for a federal review of current and projected practices of human embryo research, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, genetic modification of human embryos and. Jun 10,  · President Clinton said today that he wanted to ban the cloning of human beings but allow some cloning research while Americans debate the moral implications.

Nov 11,  · A global ban on cloning humans must be introduced "urgently" to prevent rogue scientists creating cloned babies, a United Nations report warns. The report, published by law experts at the UN. Human cloning is the creation of a genetically identical copy (or clone) of a sgtraslochi.com term is generally used to refer to artificial human cloning, which is the reproduction of human cells and sgtraslochi.com does not refer to the natural conception and delivery of identical sgtraslochi.com possibility of human cloning has raised sgtraslochi.com ethical concerns have prompted several nations to pass.

A report of five year ban on human cloning research
Rated 0/5 based on 4 review
NPR Choice page